Facebook on Saturday pushed back againstrecentreportsfrom the Wall Street Journal that cited a treasure trove of leak out company documents to delineate how Facebook executives have been dumb to react to known problems across its platforms that harm drug user . In acompany blog post , Facebook ’s vice president of global affair , Nick Clegg , suppose the article contain “ deliberate mischaracterizations ” and “ confer egregiously put on motives to Facebook ’s leaders and employees . ”
The Journal , referencing internal documents that included inquiry reports , on-line employee discussion , and drafts of demonstration to senior management , said Facebook ’s researchers sounded alarms about “ the program ’s ill effects ” metre and time again but they went ignored by higher - ups . The document unwrap party inquiry showing how prejudicious Instagram can be for teen mental wellness , that Facebook ’s executives conk out to address employee concern about reports of the platform being co - opted by human trafficker in developing state , and that Facebook gives discriminatory treatment to certain high - visibility users that flout its rule .
Clegg say that while it was “ dead legitimate ” for Facebook to be curb accountable for how it tackle harmful yield on its chopine , the Journal ’s report used cherry - picked quotes from leak out fabric to produce “ a deliberately lop - sided view of the wider facts . ”
Photo: Carl Court (Getty Images)
“ At the heart of this serial is an allegation that is just manifestly false : that Facebook direct research and then consistently and willfully ignores it if the findings are inconvenient for the company , ” Clegg said .
He went on to add : “ With any inquiry , there will be ideas for advance that are effective to pursue and idea where the tradeoffs against other important considerations are worse than the proposed fixing . The fact that not every idea that a research worker raises is act upon does n’t intend Facebook teams are not continually considering a range of different melioration . ”
Clegg defended Facebook ’s handling of posts about coronavirus vaccine selective information , another issue flagged in the Journal ’s reporting . He said the “ intersection between societal media and well - being ” is still an evolving issue within the enquiry community , and that social medium is changing rapidly in response to an “ ever - growing body of multi - method research and expert remark . ”
These target anti - vax misinformation campaigns ramped up in the calendar month afterFacebook CEO Mark Zuckerbergsignaled that the platform would not take secure action at law against anti - vaccination misinformation the same way it has for the coronavirus pandemic .
“ If someone is pointing out a case where a vaccinum make hurt or that they ’re disquieted about it — you jazz , that ’s a difficult matter to say from my view that you should n’t be allowed to express at all , ” he toldAxiosin September 2020 .
ComputingFacebookInstagramMark ZuckerbergOperating systemsSocial mediasoftware
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and culture intelligence in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
