When you buy through links on our site , we may earn an affiliate commission . Here ’s how it lick .

If a report of particles traveling faster than the fastness of light turn out to be dead on target , it will rock the foundations of New physics — and perhaps even change the way scientist think about time travelling .

But do n’t discharge up the DeLorean just yet . physicist are skeptical that thetiny subatomic particles , call neutrino , really are get around the cosmic rule that nothing goes quicker than light . And even if they are , neutrino do n’t make the best vessel for sending signals to the past tense because they pass through average affair almost unaffected , interacting only weakly with the wider Earth . [ Countdown of Bizarre Subatomic Particles ]

A tunnel in high-speed.

If subatomic particles called neutrinos can go faster than the speed of light, as scientists reported Sept.22, it would require a rethinking of the basics of physics, including the possibility of time travel.

So you may be able to send neutrino back in time , but would anyone notice ? " If you ’re attempt to get the great unwashed ’s aid by bouncing neutrino off their head , you could hold back for quite for a while , " Seth Lloyd , a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , told LiveScience .

That has n’t halt physicists from guess the possibilities in a world where dissipated - than - light travel is possible . If the neutrino experiment is confirm , it open up the door to at least sending subject matter through time using those neutrino , physicists say . You might even be able to send message to " past you " with neutrinos , one physicist suggests . experience time backwards , once guess unsufferable , might be outside the realm of sci - fi , another imago . Of course , this is all predicated on the finding being true — and it raise thorny enquiry of how the universe would work if masses were capable to go back in time and , say , efface their own existence .

Physics shocker

An abstract illustration of rays of colorful light

The news program that European researchers had find neutrinos travelingfaster than lightbroke yesterday ( Sept. 22 ) , triggering both typical scientific skepticism and pure astonishment in the physic world . In an experiment that atomise neutrino from CERN in Geneva to the INFN Gran Sass Laboratory in Italy , scientists clocked the particle outrun light by 60 nanosecond over 453.6 miles ( 730 kilometer ) — a neck - and - cervix race to be sure . [ Infographic : See How Neutrino Experiment Works ]

According to Einstein ’s possibility of Special Relativity , neutrino should n’t even be able to match light speed , much less give way it . neutrino have ( very small ) mass , and as Einstein posited in his noted E = mc squared equation , mass is equal to energy . As something speeds up , its energy increases , too . Because energy is equivalent to mass , its mass increases . Now you ’ve got a heavier physical object , so you ’ve get to add even more energy to get it choke faster . Before you have intercourse it , you need " completely undue " amount of vigour to keep edge your object toward light speed , allege Harvard University physicist Gary Feldman .

" You keep accelerating but you just incrementally come near [ scant speed ] , so you have to bestow more and more energy to go quicker and faster , but it becomes less and less effective , " Feldman told LiveScience .

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument maps the night sky from the Nicholas U. Mayall 4-meter Telescope in Arizona.

Some particles have been shown to transcend the f number of light when move around in a medium rather than a vacuum , but neutrino pass through the Earth as if it were a vacuum , so they should n’t ever be able tozip past light speed . The buzz in the purgative community is that they in all likelihood have n’t .

" Even though the experimenters have done a very measured problem and it ’s a very impressive paper … it was a very complicated analysis and there ’s always a possibility that there ’s just an error in what they did , " Feldman said .

One possible error could be in the reckoning the scientist used to sort out for the effect of the air in their experiment , Lloyd said . Light actually gets a chip bogged down when it is n’t in a vacuum , while neutrinos zip through the atmosphere without any force . It ’s potential that the CERN investigator miscalculated in correcting for the atmospherical effect and that neutrino are n’t actually snuff it quicker , but the visible radiation is just going a smidgen slower than they bring in .

Engineer stand inside the KATRIN neutrino experiment at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany.

If it ’s true …

But if the solution do hold , " it ’s major , it ’s humongous , it ’s the biggest thing in 100 days , " said Michio Kaku , a theoretic physicist at the City University of New York .

" You ’re blab out about a tidal wave hitting physic if it ’s true , " Kaku told LiveScience . " There are two rocks upon whichmodern physicsis base . One is quantum hypothesis and one is Einstein’s theory of relativity . If one of the pillars lessen , we ’re in abstruse difficulty . "

Atomic structure, large collider, CERN concept.

What does that entail fortime travel ? In theory , it might be more potential than scientists had opine . Einstein repoint out that time is relative : As you approach light pep pill , your experience of time is not the same as it is for the common people chug along at their common velocity . What feels like a second to you will feel like much longer to them . This idea , called " time dilatation , " spawned such sci - fi classic as 1968 ’s " Planet of the Apes , " in which what feels like 18 calendar month to Charleton Heston and his crew is enough time for gorillas , chimps and orangutans to evolve language and complex societies back on Earth . [ Top 10 Scary Sci - Fi Series ]

There are a lot of barrier to approaching unclouded speed , much less founder it , but if you could , you could theoretically experience metre scat backward , Kaku said . Here ’s how it would play : As you come near light speed , you might time goes slower in the outside world than it does for you . When you hit light speed , the outside world goes so dumb in relation to you that it contain ( again , in relation to you ; citizenry in the outside world experience as if time is the same as always ) . So if you could push past that velocity terminus ad quem , the outside world would be so slow as to be be active backward in relative to you .

So far , this seems pretty much impossible , not least because some other side consequence of faster - than - lightness travel should let in reducing your system of weights and width to less than nothing , Kaku say . [ view : Can You Time Travel ? ]

An illustration of a black hole churning spacetime around it

If the neutrino are really going quicker than wanton , though , it might be possible to use them to communicate with the yesteryear , Lloyd said . You could station off a flying - than - lightness subject matter to someone moving at a rapid velocity with respect to you . They could then bounce the faster - than - light source message back , and it would go far before the sign you send to them .

One way to cerebrate of this is like a mirror , Lloyd said . You post a message to the mirror , and it reflects it back , but so speedily that " past you " is the one who receives it .

Stuck in time

an illustration of two black holes swirling together

But all of this is arguable if it ’s only neutrino that can be coaxed past the speed of brightness level , Lloyd said . Because they do n’t interact with much , your substance would likely go unnoticed by preceding generations . An April 13 , 1865 , monish to Abraham Lincoln not to go into Ford ’s Theater the next day would pass through the president like a ghost . [ Read:‘Time Traveler ' Spotted ? ]

Doing forth with Einstein ’s theory would also elaborate causality , the idea that things work each other in chronological rules of order . When you allow the past times , present and futurity to interact , " that gets all messed up , " Lloyd state , and youstart to get paradoxes . A classic is theGrandfather Paradox : What if you went back in time and spud your grandfather , preventing your own birth and thus preventing yourself from ever shooting your grandad ?

It ’s a headache , to say the least . And not all researcher are positive that the finding , even if true , would ultimately rescind the well - quiz , century - old Special Theory of Relativity that keeps things from getting so mussy .

How It Works issue 163 - the nervous system

" This consequence is very small , it ’s two voice in 100,000 , " Feldman said . " If this is truthful , what it means is that there is some aspect of the Special Theory of Relativity that ’s been look out over or not understood well , but I ca n’t imagine that it really overcome the Special Theory of Relativity . "

To create the optical atomic clocks, researchers cooled strontium atoms to near absolute zero inside a vacuum chamber. The chilling caused the atoms to appear as a glowing blue ball floating in the chamber.

The gold foil experiments gave physicists their first view of the structure of the atomic nucleus and the physics underlying the everyday world.

Abstract chess board to represent a mathematical problem called Euler�s office problem.

Google celebrated the life and legacy of scientist Stephen Hawking in a Google Doodle for what would have been his 80th birthday on Jan. 8, 2022.

Abstract physics image showing glowing blobs orbiting a central blob.

An image comparing the relative sizes of our solar system�s known dwarf planets, including the newly discovered 2017 OF201

a view of a tomb with scaffolding on it

an illustration showing a large disk of material around a star

A small phallic stalagmite is encircled by a 500-year-old bracelet carved from shell with Maya-like imagery

a person holds a GLP-1 injector

A man with light skin and dark hair and beard leans back in a wooden boat, rowing with oars into the sea

an abstract illustration depicting the collision of subatomic particles